---- START NEW MESSAGE --- Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A0BE1E4900D2; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:01:34 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <7.00CC0E4D@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 9:01:24 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 9184 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:01:17 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 1411; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:59:48 -0500 Received: from *unknown [203.89.236.159] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with ESMTP ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:59:47 EST X-Warning: mitvma.mit.edu: Host *unknown claimed to be muvium Received: from CP301356a ([203.45.91.76]) by muvium with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:08:10 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2004 14:08:10.0531 (UTC) FILETIME=[29380730:01C3E5A8] Message-ID: <002f01c3e5a6$eee36e40$8400a8c0@CP301356a> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:59:17 +1100 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: James Caska Subject: Re: [OT]: JAL licensing (was SCO lobbying Congress about Linux) To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: <001301c3e5a5$287e3470$0b00a8c0@PAARD> Precedence: list X-RCPT-TO: Status: U X-UIDL: 371856101 >I don't want anyone to charge for a modified library. I think the BSD does not prevent that. Is there a specific example where someone has done this that has got you concerned? James Caska www.muvium.com uVM - 'Java Bred for Embedded' -----Original Message----- From: pic microcontroller discussion list [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of Wouter van Ooijen Sent: Thursday, 29 January 2004 12:47 AM To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Subject: Re: [OT]: JAL licensing (was SCO lobbying Congress about Linux) > I'm not sure I completely understand your goals for a license so > permit me this one question - what prevents you from using a BSD type > license for the libraries, while keeping the compiler itself under > GPL? I don't want anyone to charge for a modified library. I think the BSD does not prevent that. Wouter van Ooijen -- ------------------------------------------- Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl consultancy, development, PICmicro products -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics .