On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:18:30AM +0100, Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
> > Cool. Question: has the protocol changed in such a way that
> > Woj Zabolotny's
> > linwload would fail?
>
> Same for the 16F87X chips, but for th 16F87XA chips a write only happens
> in clusters of 4, so the protocol must always send all four addresses
> (with lower bits 00, 01, 10, 11).

I see. Should be a simple change. I wonder if for the 87XA bootloader if it
should simply ignore programming commands (L commands) unless it's a 11 in
the address. So for 00, 01, 10 it simply loads the location, but for 11 it
loads the location and does the program. Then the protocol works unchanged
from the host side.

>
> > Or is XWisp written in Python?
>
> Of course.

Cool. I'll have to take a look the next time I get going.

>
> PS I am not confident that your answers to the 'combined?' questions are
> correct.

Maybe it's something we should bring to gnu.misc.discuss.

BAJ

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics