On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:40:00PM +0100, Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
> > A better solution is to recode JAL to produce relocatable
> > objects. Then the
> > full force of the LGPL can then be utilized.
>
> Defintely no. Jal is an 'all-at-once' compiler by design. One of the
> reasons is that I wanted it to be able to do global optimizations and
> analysis, like for instance the stack use warning/error.

Then there's only one solution left: Write a new license which is the LGPL
with the exception of the user relink requirement. It's the only option left.

BAJ

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads