Rob Hamerling wrote :

> So for a PIC programmer it may not be a problem if a 16F767 and 16F777
> would use the same ID. The reason that I mentioned the 28-pins DIP
> package was to say that I'm sure it is _not_ a 16F777 (I didn't
> mention it, but it has also 16F767 printed on the body!).


You say that the fact that the 16F767 and the 777 are sharing the
same ID isn't a (major) problem (if they, from the programmers point
of view, are the "same"). Fine.

Then you say that the fact that the 767 reads an ID that is
documented to be a 777 is an error, right ?

Isn't that a contradiction in a way ?
If they *do* share ID, how could you use the ID to separate them ?

Just trying to learn here... :-)

Jan-Erik.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads