> 2) Any code that simply uses the library is not affected by
> the LGPL status of the library.

Better read the LGPL again and/or give a better definition of 'simply
uses'.

> So given that the answer is simple: relicense everything
> under the BSD license.
> It meets points #1 and #2, while making no further
> requirements on users or developers.

But I want a GPL-like stickyness on the library. I certainly don't want
to be conformted with an updated version of the library that I must pay
for to use!

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads