>Capitalism is about the right of each individual to control their own
>capital. Capital is far more than money. (Money is of course just a
> "place
>holder" to represent capital). Capital can include financial assets (or
>things that money can buy), health, enjoyment of life and more.

> > This argument shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the meaning and
> > basis of capital.

I'll reply to this again.
I don't think I misunderstand what "capital" means (obviously enough).
I'd be genuinely interested in knowing what parts of my (loose) definition
of  capital you disagreed with.
I assume you agree with the concept of it representing tangibles which can
be converted to or purchased with money.

I assume you disagree with some part of the suggestion that intangibles or
indirectly quantifiable items also represent capital.

eg
Acquired skills (the result of training or practice) which may assist in
generation of money.

The acquisition or cultivation of things which create senses of well being,
improved mental state, better health etc (eg looking at beautiful sunsets).

The translation of money or equivalent into social capital. (Whose name will
be better known a century from now - W Gate$ or Linus T's). And whose money
will do better for them a century from now.)

 Comment would be appreciated.



        Russell McMahon

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads