>
> > > As far as I can read, it allows my stuff to be linked into
> > other code
> > > without requiring a source level distribution of the other
> > code. It does
> > > require that *my* code be kept free.
> >
> > That's close to the mark. However there are two important caveats:
>
> As far as I read the LGPL any complete executable application (as a PIC
> program has to be) that is distributed and contains LGPL code must be
> accompanied by the full source. If you think otherwise please mention
> the LGPL section that allows you to do otherwise.

It looks like you're correct.

I need to find a new license that allows my framework to be kept free
while allowing it to be used in commercial products.

Of course, since my framework is a Java package it will seldom be
hard-linked with other programs.
--
D. Jay Newman           !
jay@sprucegrove.com     ! Xander: Giles, don't make cave-slayer unhappy.
http://enerd.ws/robots/ !

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body