Too funny! Now I'm emailing myself.

---
James.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Newton [mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com]
Sent: 2004 Jan 20, Tue 05:24
To: James Newton; Host
Subject: [EE] Why don't baud rates just double? has no topic tag.

James, Did you know many list subscribers didn't get your Post? The subject
line on your post of 01\20\2004 at 192023: "[EE] Why don't baud rates just
double?" does NOT contain a correct topic tag.

<SNIP>

-----Original Message-----
From: James Newton [mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com]
Sent: 2004 Jan 20, Tue 05:24
To: James Newton; Host
Subject: [EE] Why don't baud rates just double?

Why is each higher baud rate twice as fast until 14.4K which is only 1.5
times faster than 9600?

115,200
 57,600
 28,800
 14,400
    ?
  9,600
  4,800
  2,400
  1,200
    600
    300

---
James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin
mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com  1-619-652-0593 phone
http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786
PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body