> Debbie Hynes wrote: > > > pity 'bout the ol'F84 being obsolete - my fav processor. > > When Olin says the 16F84 is obsolete, all he really means is that > he doesn't use it. There are other PICs that may cost less > and/or have more features, but the 16F84 is still in production > and isn't going away any time soon. Just because something is still made doesn't mean it's not obsolete. 386 processors were made for YEARS after they were considered obsolete, in fact they are STILL being made in one form or another. The 84, along with the 54, is obsolete, in every respect of it's meaning. Just because something is obsolete does not mean it's not useful in certain circumstances. TTYL ---------------------------------- Herbert's PIC Stuff: http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/ -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body