Wally Barnacle wrote : > Hi Wouter Of course you are very welcome to say "Hi" to Wouter whenever you want, but it was me asking :-) :-) Anwyay... > To put it another way why would anybody want to use a > programmer that does as many chips as possible for such > a state of affairs? Economics A single-chip-programmer could very well cost *more* since it probably would have a smaller market and be a special design for this task. Larger volumes -> lower cost, right ? > As stated in another thread, why obsfuscate the the > situation since once you know how any micro does what > it does, you can apply it to any other micro outside > the classrooom. You still have to configure your environment (MPLAB or whatever) with regards to the the selected target chip. Jan-Erik -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body