Mike W wrote :

> > > This may, or may not, interest you...
> > >
> > > http://www.amqrp.org/elmer160/board/index.html
> >
> > Nice idea, but why a PIC16F84 ?? It seems to be a quite
> > recent design, judging from the dates on the page.
> >
>
> I believe the thought process behind the use of the 16F84 was that
> it is/was the most basic flash PIC. Once students gain familiarity
> with the 'F84 they can easily? migrate to bigger and better devices.
> Also the availability of numerous packages and designs to help
> inspire the student.


But the F84 isn't the most basic flash PIC any more.
It's obsolete, dead, costly and lacking many features
of those PICs that a long time ago replaced the F84.
I'm not going to suggest a F84 based kit to my local school.
I'm primarily looking for something with a 18F-chip.

If the "Elmer" board realy is a new (2003) design, IMHO
they made a mistake when selecting PIC...

Never mind, it's not a real option for me anyway.

And don't get me wrong, I realy *do* value that you
took your time and posted the links !

Jan-Erik.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics