On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:18:29 -0500, Ken Pergola wrote on Re:
[PIC:] Pic as an i2c slave:

>I'm just a little confused here. If I understand you correctly, you
>mentioned there are two versions of app note AN734.
>From what I've been accustom to, Microchip denotes their document =
revisions
>with a letter suffix on their document number.

I am no specialist in Microchip AN numbering, but I have
always believed that an AN with a letter added had to be a
corrected version; further, if you give a look at the list
of ANs at:

http://www.microchip.com/1010/suppdoc/appnote/alpha/index.htm,

you will notice that some of them (00575.pdf, 00584.pdf,
etc) do not have a letter after the number. I suppose they
are the original, uncorrected versions.

>The only document # I can find on AN734 is '00734A' which would indicate
>that this is the first and only version to date.
>If there are two versions, I'd like to compare the two, but I can only =
find
>one published version:
>
>Title:          Using the PICmicro SSP for Slave I2C Communication
>Name:           AN734
>Date:           08/07/2000
>Author:         Stephen Bowling
>Document #: 00734A
>
>
>Could you or someone shed light on this?

I suppose that the thing to do when some documentation is
corrected or complemented, is to get rid of the old,
erroneous information which has just been superceeded.

This could explain why AN734 is nowhere to be found.

* Xrobert.soubie@free.frX (veuillez supprimer les "X")
* http://www.astrosurf.com/soubie
* Au royaume des aveugles, les borgnes sont mal vus... - P.Dac

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads