David VanHorn <dvanhorn@CEDAR.NET> wrote :

> &gt;
> &gt;I don't want to go to the AVR base because I have no development st=
uff for
> the series - right now the only thing I have to work with is the PIC MP=
LAB and
> the flash devices.
>=20
> You have my sympathies :)
>=20
> Still, even in the pic, it's workable. &lt;VBG&gt;
> I did a command interpreter for a tokenized language in EE, plus a bunc=
h of
> command routines, plus a full duplex bit-banged uart in an F84 once.
>=20
> I'd take a hardware uart anytime though.
> At least develop it that way at first, then you can go bit-banged if yo=
u must,
> and you're only debugging that layer.
>

Agreed, agreed, etc.:

I am looking again at the '628A - that was my original thought and it loo=
ks like I will go back to it.  Save myself some trouble all around.=20

Roy J. Gromlich

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads