David VanHorn <dvanhorn@CEDAR.NET> wrote :
Thanks:

That is the kind of thing I need. I was originally thinking of using a ve=
ry cheap / simple PIC with UART to serve as a dummy comm device.  When I =
saw the 3100 I thought it might be a good alternative - seems like like m=
y original idea may be easier to get working. =20

I don't want to go to the AVR base because I have no development stuff fo=
r the series - right now the only thing I have to work with is the PIC MP=
LAB and the flash devices.

Roy


> Yes, and polling for status is a little interesting since you might not=
 always
> want to take the data.
>=20
> Me, I'd use a small AVR with uart, get buffer ram and more smarts for f=
ree, and
> byte-wide or SPI comms, or anything else I want..
>=20
> I used the 3100's on one project, but not again.
>=20
> --
> http://www.piclist.com
> hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
> [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads



___________________________________
NOCC, http://nocc.sourceforge.net

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads