Hi-
Well PicForth is jammed into the 877, and is limited by the architecture
to some extent, but I am quite impressed by what they accomplished.  I
expect the 18F series would be a much better fit for the langauage.  It
uses GForth as a compiler base.
David

D. Jay Newman wrote:

>>Hi-
>>I am interested in this subject.  There is an interesting Picforth
>>implementation targeting the 877 -- I would be very interested in
>>extending this to the 18F series.  Perhaps we can make a multi-headed
>>(monster) compiler?
>>
>>
>
>Even though I'm a forth guy from way back (I built my first Forth in '85
>for a fairly newly available chip -- the 68000), I'm not sure that Forth
>is the best base. It would be interesting to look at to see if it could
>be used.
>--
>D. Jay Newman           !
>jay@sprucegrove.com     ! Xander: Giles, don't make cave-slayer unhappy.
>http://enerd.ws/robots/ !
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
>email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body