> Unless I were seriously constrained by $money$ I would do all development
> for the 18C 18F series.

Agreed.

However, if you're going for an open-source "stamp", you might as well
make it an open-source byte-code interpreter. That way people can write
compilers for BASIC, Forth, Java, whatever.

*If* the bytecode interpreter is made general enough it should be able
to cover most languages. LISP on a PIC anyone?  :)

Seriously, I'd be interested in helping to design such a bytecode
interpreter.

I'd also like to see it licensed in such a way that commercial sources
could sell this so that not everybody would need a programmer to use
it.
--
D. Jay Newman           !
jay@sprucegrove.com     ! Xander: Giles, don't make cave-slayer unhappy.
http://enerd.ws/robots/ !

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body