Unless I were seriously constrained by $money$ I would do all development for the 18C 18F series. The instruction set is much richer and makes many things a LOT easier and less code intensive. I have some old apps which used very simple PICs, which wouldn't really benefit - actually just logic chip replacement type projects. Anything else it will be 18s all the way. Roy J. Gromlich ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan-Erik Soderholm XA (TN/PAC)" To: Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [PIC]: Any one interested in developing a Open Source stamp c lone using 16F87X > Ji. > > Target a 18-series PIC instead and you get a lot > of added features. The cost of the PIC will > probably be just a (smaller ?) part of the > whole project anyway. I think that 18-series > architecture also makes it easier to implement > the runtime environment processing the byte tokens. > > With a "Stamp clone", do you mean something that runs the > same source code or just built more or less the same way ? > > Jan-Erik. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pic microcontroller discussion list > > [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of PSL > > Sent: den 10 januari 2004 18:58 > > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > > Subject: [PIC]: Any one interested in developing a Open Source stamp > > clone using 16F87X > > > > > > Hi any one want to develop a basic stamp clone > > > > using byte oriented token can create something that work like > > a basic stamp > > or better. > > > > Any one interested we can talk about it and do it together > > using what we > > find on the piclist resource > > > > :) > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body > -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body