Ji.

Target a 18-series PIC instead and you get a lot
of added features. The cost of the PIC will
probably be just a (smaller ?) part of the
whole project anyway. I think that 18-series
architecture also makes it easier to implement
the runtime environment processing the byte tokens.

With a "Stamp clone", do you mean something that runs the
same source code or just built more or less the same way ?

Jan-Erik.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pic microcontroller discussion list
> [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of PSL
> Sent: den 10 januari 2004 18:58
> To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: [PIC]: Any one interested in developing a Open Source stamp
> clone using 16F87X
>
>
> Hi any one want to develop a basic stamp clone
>
> using byte oriented token can create something that work like
> a basic stamp
> or better.
>
> Any one interested we can talk about it and do it together
> using what we
> find on the piclist resource
>
> :)
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
> email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body