John N. Power wrote: > The following is from National Semiconductor application note=20 > AN-72, "The LM3900 - A new current-differencing quad of=20 > +/- input amplifiers. (September 1972)", It took me less than 1.5 min to download 300K datasheet=20 "LM2900/LM3900/LM3301 Quad Amplifiers" February 1995 > page 3: > " The open-loop gain changes only slightly over the complete=20 > power supply voltage range and is essentially independent of=20 > temperature changes." I've searched the 1995 datasheet with the word "slightly" and=20 "essentially": - no occurrences were found. If they used the=20 1972 vocabulary now they would get kicked off the market=20 shortly. > Clearly, there is no expectation that the mirror gain changes > significantly. What is it "expectation" and how much is "significantly" - 0.01%=20 or 10 times? Either this must be specified in a datasheet or this=20 MUST NOT be talked about at all, I think. > There are numerous examples of triangle, sawtooth and=20 > ramp generators in this apnote. A change in mirror gain with=20 > input current would cause a supposedly linear output to be=20 > curved.=20 An app note is just a note, not a datasheet. And what is it=20 "supposedly"? > The applications given in this note would not work if this > happened.=20 "Triangle, sawtooth and ramp generators" will work but with unspecified distortions. > I would breadboard a circuit myself and check this, > but I can't do it right now.=20 LM3900 production has been discontinued in former=20 Millennium by National (Don't know about Motorola). Does this=20 chip deserve to get breadboard now? > I trust National to know something about these matters. Yeah, they are great guys. Their modern op amps are far better=20 than obsolete discontinued LM3900 (1972). > In any case, the amplifier does have limitations. The most pronounced > is its lack of speed. It is suitable only up to audio frequencies. It > is not intended for precision work, and that was not the original > application. The chip is second sourced by Motorola, has been > around for a respectable amount of time, as you can see from the > date on the apnote, and is still available. This would not happen > if it had serious problems with linearity. Regards, Mike. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.