On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:15:00 +0100, you wrote:

>Mike Hord wrote:
>> If my math is right, a 2% error in a 115.2 kbps
>> system...
>
>I'd just like to note that the actual buad rate is
>irrelevant when talking about *rellative* baud rate
>errors (such as "2% error"). If 2% is acceptable for
>*one* baud rate, it's acceptable for *all* baud rates.
>
>Jan-Erik.

Except that at higher rates you may have additional error sources like =
driver rise/fall time, jitter
etc. which will could eat into your error budget.
=20

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics