You'd probably do better by concentrating your efforts on developing a
perpetual motion machine.

These $1000-2000 units *can* already be built for $10. That's what
makes them such a great scam.


Regards, Bob


On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:07:07 +0100, tino wrote:

>Does anyone have experience with physical water treatment?
>
>There are many products around, promising to change the structure of
>calcium carbonate in a way, that this does not deposit within tubes, water
>heaters, ...
>You can read a lot of people, telling that these products work well, and
>others, telling that they don't work at all.
>
>I think the only thing that does not need any discussions is, that all
>these products are build of components worth almost nothing, but cost a
>lot.
>I think an electromagnetic water treater, which costs between 1-2k$ could
>be built for about $10, if you know what it really does.
>
>I've seen pictures of such devices, containing a microcontroller, some
>transistors and 2 electromagnets. others only have some glue logic, which
>directly drives 2 antenna like wires.
>
>As far as i understand, most of the electromagnetic products have 1 or
>more electromagnets, which get either a constant ac frequency, or sweep a
>frequency range.
>
>It would be of great help, if someone could publish the frequency and
>power, that these treaters usually work with, and eventually, someone has
>experience with self built products.
>
>thanx a lot!
>
>tino

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.