Yes, I *did* guess that :-)

My question was realy, what would be gained from *that* ?
Why would one "bypass the use of the CPLD" in a working design ?

Never mind, it's no big deal...

Jan-Erik.

Herbert Graf wrote:

>I'm guessing they want to bypass the use of the CPLD. TTYL
>
>> Interesting.
>> What would be gained from that ?
>> Jan-Erik.
>>
>> Bob Axtell wrote :
> > > Is there anyway that you could send a PDF of the CPLD logic-equalivancy
> > > schematic? That way we non-XILINX folks can implement the logic
> > > in SMD 74F logic...
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
> mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu