>Russell McMahon
>
>Without having read the materialism not sure what
>counts as "non renewable resources" but odds are
>lunar Helium 3 isn't on their list. Adding this,

You are missing the point Russell.  Any energy source on the moon might as
well be a billion light years away because we would expend more energy
retrieving it than we would ever recover by burning it.

Read this article: ENERGETIC LIMITS TO GROWTH
http://www.dieoff.com/page175.htm

It's an article I wrote for ENERGY MAGAZINE.  It explains net energy,
describes the results of the COR study, and more.

I have to go back to work.

Good luck,
Jay

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu