I've considered starting out with the 16F84 too....is there a better one =
to start out with?=20

I'd like to go for something in the 16Fxxx range....those 12F's seem a bit =
small...:)

>>> tcs@CMCORP.COM 11/12/03 03:00PM >>>
In my (Not so) Humble opinion, having coded MC68HC11s,
you will find the advanced PICs with many analog inputs
just as easy to deal with as the HC11.

BTW the 16F84 is an almost dead product!


  *
  |  __O    Thomas C. Sefranek  WA1RHP@ARRL.NET=20
  |_-\<,_   Amateur Radio Operator: WA1RHP
  (*)/ (*)  Bicycle mobile on 145.41 MHz PL 74.4

ARRL Instructor, Technical Specialist, VE Contact.
http://hamradio.cmcorp.com/inventory/Inventory.html=20
http://www.harvardrepeater.org=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pic microcontroller discussion list
> [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of Ruben Aguilera
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:12 PM
> To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
> Subject: WWW page
>
>
> I recently acquire a serial 16F84 programmer and a PIC, Does anyone have =
a
> suggestion on a www page to search for applications, I want to use the =
pic
> for small projects of pneumatic control, this means some kind of =
magnetic
> /light   detection , probably one analog input also , I'm beginning to
> learn the basic programming skills, I know that this is probably to much
> for the 16F84, but I want to use the 16F84 first and then in time jump =
to
> the  68C11(analog inputs).
>
> Thanks and Regards to all.
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
> mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu=20
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu