While the entire site uses the rhetoric of science to lay the foundation
of credibility, the most they have is links to some studies on only two
topics.  There is nothing on the website that leads me to believe that
the "Physicians and Scientist for Responsible Application of Science and
Technology" has more than one member of unknown credibility.  I would
much prefer a more balanced approach, such as you've taken with your
paper.  They should be linking to all studies done on their concerns,
not just those that support their position.

Interesting info, though.

-Adam

Russell McMahon wrote:

>[EE:] Safety problems with mobile phones
>
>I offer the following site as a service to our readers :-)
>
>        http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm
>
>I have read almost none of the material and do not "recommend" it per se,
>but they seem largely sane and sensible people. As is always the case with
>this subject, some of the links are sure to be utter garbage. Some should
>provide pause for thought.
>
>Those with a GE bent may wish to look at their GE food section at
>
>        http://www.psrast.org/intropage.htm
>
>or their general GE section at
>
>        http://www.psrast.org/siteguide.htm
>
>
>Treat all that you read with due care and scepticism, as always. But do take
>note of what you read.
>
>
>
>
>
>        Russell McMahon
>
>
>___________________________________________________________
>If we have already accidentally created an unexpectedly lethal virus by
>single
>gene transfer, why should we believe that it might not happen again, once
>or on numerous occasions in future, but in less controlled circumstances?
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
>mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu
>
>
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.