Olin Lathrop wrote:

> The 16F648A is not a radically new design.  It is essentially a 16F628
> with 2K more program memory added.  And, that whole family has been
> reasonably trouble free.  Do you remember any problems when the 16F628
> first came out?
>
> I've also tried the 16F648A in one application where I had a 16F628 that
> was maxxed out.  So far no problems have been noticed.

I can't remember the exact details but there is a problem with the 16F648A.
Something to do with writing to the data eeprom.

a google search of old news (last 4 months) should find the details.

Regards
Sergio Masci

http://www.xcprod.com/titan/XCSB - optimising structured PIC BASIC compiler

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics