On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:02:28 -0500, you wrote:

>Space constraints make a larger device not easily used ... but maybe
>I'll bite the bullet and do what it takes.
>
>I'm curious about the Cygnal parts as a wholesale alternative to the
>PIC, to permanently abandon mchip and unfortunately my monetary
>investment in PIC tools and mental investment in knowing technical
>details across their product line.

Compared to many other makers, I'd say Microchip are better than avarage =
at admitting errors,
issuing errata etc.=20
This one, and the PIC16C74 BRGH issue are the only ones I can recall, out=
 of a HUGE number of parts.

PICs are used by so many people that any issule like this are likely to =
surface and become public
knowledge, even if the maker doesn;t acknowledge them. This is much less =
likely to happen on less
widely used parts.=20

=20

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body