Russell,

 Count me in.   I don't know if I could offer any specific critizisms or
 not, but I can proofread the document, and I have higher than average
 intellegence, so I believe I could add something.

                                               Thanks and Regards,

                                                      Jim



> I am writing a "populist" magazine article about some aspects of
> Genetic Engineering.
> Target is GE sceptics and undecideds with average or better
> intelligence. Article is 2500 words max.
>
> I would be grateful if anyone felt able to offer critical review of the
> article as it progresses.
> I would send out perhaps one or two drafts and a "release candidate".
>
> ** No obligation to reply or provide any input but any responses would
> be valued. **
>
> If your think you MIGHT be able to help, please send in your name. You
> can always just ignore the material when it arrives if too busy..
>
> I will simply make a list of anyone who responds and send anything
> material to people on the list.
>
> I am happy for you to have ANY STANCE WHATSOEVER on GE. Comments may be
> as brief or detailed as desired and may be on content or format or
> grammar or whatever. My aim is factual material but without extensive
> supporting material due to 2500 word limit. References will be provided
> on a website. (All references will be to essentially pro-GE or GE
> friendly scientific community papers or articles.)
>
> Deadline is 25 hours from now and there are other things which are due
> to make demands on my time twixt then and now.
> I have much material that I have written but need to pull it together
> in a form which is cogent and convincing.
>
> Are you able to help?
>
>
>         Russell McMahon
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
> (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.