What ever happened to Heathkit? I built my first Heathkit scope 20 years ago. It cost $200 and was a single trace, 5mHz. Big too. Then I built the PC storage scope about 10 years ago (4802). It cost $200 also, dual trace and I believe 20mHz. Maybe 10. Both still work great. I don't think Heathkits are made anymore, are they? John > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hulatt, Jon" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 6:17 AM > Subject: [EE:] choosing a scope > > > > I've only recently got started with PIC. I'm a computer programmer by trade, > and a consultancy/contract job i had recently caused me to dip my hands into > pic development for a simple project- basically sampling A/D at precisely > 25Hz and chucking the data out to a PC on the USART. I've got an A-Level in > electronics, but my experience ends there. Safe to say i'm not a complete > monkey, more of an educated baboon. > > Anyway, despite that project having finished, i'm still playing with pics > but now on a hobbyist level. It's good fun and i'm enjoying it. There are > lots of things in the pipeline for me, mainly projects for my car. > > But i'm coming to the realisation that I could really do with an > oscilloscope. But, on my hobby budget, I can't afford to spend very much. I > could possibly stretch as far as #200, but i'd prefer not to go past #150. > The problem is, beyond the usage of scopes at college, I don't really know > enough about what i'm going to use it for to be able to spec out what I > realistically need. > > I've seen that I can get a new Kenwood CS1010 for #160, but it's bandwidth > is 10MHz and it's single trace. Am I going to want more bandwidth than that > for PIC related work? > > Then there is the option of the elektor gameboy scope, or the PICO pc-based > scopes. These appeal less- i'd rather have a standalone unit. But are they > going to be suitable for my usage? > > Are there any other options i've not considered? > > It's kind of a funny question really. I'm asking for some of you guys to > tell me what I want, if you know what i mean!!! > > Thanks in advance for your comments and info. > > Jon > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.