New simple statement of "facts" added as first menu item re "low risk"
versus "safe"

    Why Scientists do not say that GM activities are "Safe".

        www.tinyurl.com/nz4u

I would greatly welcome any robust constructive criticism of the new paper
(small PDF only to maintain format) or any of the other material on the
site.

Anyone who is pro-Genetic Engineering and thinks  all the protests against
it are rubbish and that anyone who opposes it must have rocks in their head
and .... is very very welcome to tell me why. I'm happy to learn and very
keen to see what is wrong with anything that I am asserting. So far locally
all I get is that anti-GE people are leftie greenie sandal wearing luddite
freaks who can't think and who want to pointlessly turn back the clock. What
I WANT are some objective criticisms of the reasons that i give to think
that GE may produce disasters unheard of if we proceed as we are doing at
present.


            Russell McMahon

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body