> I only glanced at the link, but I thought it did? On page 6 or 7 or
> something like that, doesn't it mention FAT? I know it references a MS
> document about FAT. I didn't think the article itself went deep enough.
> Might want to have a glance at the source.

        The article basically says: by reading the microsoft document they were
able to read parts of the FAT, but we're not going to give you any of that
code... :) TTYL

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads