Yet another "second thought"...

If I am ORG'ing the table subroutine on an even
256 byte boundary, there is realy no need for this
256-byte-page-boundary checking, right ?
(PCLATH might have to be loaded anyway, of course).

I'v done some experimenting (12F629) and it seems as
the linker can happly handle a mix of relocatable and
ORG'ed code. You might get a minor area just before
the ORG where the linker can't stuff anything, but by
using a larger number of smaller modules, this effect
can be minimized, right ?

Jan-Erik.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads