Andre, Perhaps we have lost the plot here. I take it your original question went unanswered?. What was your original question - perhaps we can focus on it more preceisely. Sorry if we tend to wander around a bit.. -- Lawrence Lile andre abelian Sent by: pic microcontroller discussion list 09/29/2003 03:12 PM Please respond to pic microcontroller discussion list To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU cc: Subject: Re: [EE:] need help on c code continue Peter, This is amazing. I asked question about my C code first replay was no comments. since then every body started to talk about comments And later became cobol then Ada then the tag changed to [EE] soon the tag will be [OT] then will start talk about some thing else. Andre -----Original Message----- From: pic microcontroller discussion list [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter L. Peres Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:38 AM To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Subject: Re: [EE:] need help on c code continue >> > There is no such thing as self-documenting code. > > You aint seen Cobol ! :-) Cobol is not self-documenting, it is self-obfuscating imho. SQL is more or less self documenting imho, and I heard that Ada is even more so (but I never used Ada). Peter -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads