Alan B. Pearce wrote:

> >This has an impact on my current project where I have a fixed "table"
> >in EEPROM. Maybe better to move the table (64 bytes) to Flash space.

> Or just keep a 24 bit counter somewhere, and when it overflows on being
> incremented by each eeprom write, then refresh the table by reading the
> value in a location, and rewriting the same value back to that location.


Well, it's already been moved into a RETLW table :-)

As the design is right now, this table never changes.

But, otoh, the values in the EEPROM the *does* changes,
probably changes fewer then D124 times anyway, so this
might be a non-issue after all.

Jan-Erik.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads