for the record, i *LOVE* pic basic pro. it's wonderfull being able to do 95% of your stuff in uber-simple basic, and just do the have-to's with inline assembly. i get stuff done about 100x faster than i think i ever could in all assembler. dld On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:02:00 +0100, spacecat wrote: >Why is it a silly compiler ? >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Olin Lathrop" >To: >Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:51 PM >Subject: Re: [PIC]: Interrupts > > >> > that part isn't assembler. it's picbasic. i only require help on the >> > assembler part, as that's what the ISR is done in. >> >> Don't you just love it when someone has busted code and is asking >> for help, but insists on telling you exactly where the problem is, as if >> they know what they are doing. >> >> The details are very important, especially in an ISR. Ditch the silly >> Basic compiler, or at least write the interrupt module in MPASM. Then we >> can see *exactly* what it's doing (including the parts you don't think are >> important but may well be where the problem is). >> >> >> ***************************************************************** >> Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts >> (978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com >> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different >> ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. >> > >-- >http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different >ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. David Dunn Digital Racing Products dave@digitalracingproducts.com www.digitalracingproducts.com -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.