Wouter,

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:29:17 +0200, Wouter van Ooijen
wrote:

(Actually you didn't - you were quoting someone else!)

> > I hate scrolling too.
> > Therefore I prefer to see the reply at the bottom.

I prefer replies where the text is in context, with
parts of the reply interleaved so that they apply to the
part of the message above, so you can just read
downwards.  As I'm doing now!  :-)

> I must confess I use MSOutlook

What an admission for someone of your talent, Wouter!
:-)

> which displays the top part of the
> message, so a reply at the bottom is invisible unless
I scroll. Which in
> mos cases I don't, so I don't see most bottom replies.

This is my second choice, after interleaved.  At least
you don't have to scroll down to see what the original
was, then back up for the reply.

> I guess the world must be divided in top-repliers and
bottom-replieres,
> and they never communicate because they don't read ech
other's posts :)

So where does that leave us interleaved-repliers?  Do
neither top nor bottom-repliers not read them?  (No need
to reply if "Yes"! :-)

I suppose I find myself in the minority, as usual.  In
the Windows vs. Mac debate, I use OS/2!  :-)

Cheers,

Howard Winter
St.Albans, England

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics