On Thursday 11 Sep 2003 11:46 pm, you wrote:
> What is difficult with the idea of "getting as much free idle time as
> possible" ?
>
> The lookup table I recently implemented works and speeds up the process but
> I don't like the idea of having over 200 buts of ROM used up as place
> holders in the decode table. Only 16 are used.
>
> Thus the original question, does someone have a better way of implementing
> the lookup table (or some similar algorithm) that is more efficient.
>
> "More" meaning does not require 256 bytes of ROM.
>

So to give us a marker for what would be 'better', how long does you current
look up table take to decode and what total memory (code plus table) does it
use?

Ian

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body