Without commenting on (or at this stage wanting to spend time to examine the
merits of) the technical argument, surely that's not a very polite way to
make your point Mike? :-)

If someone is genuinely trying to explain an EE point then, even if they
don't get it quite right, a gentle pointer in the right direction is liable
to be most productive. we all get it wrong technically sometimes. Given how
much annoyance even the gentlest of public remonstrance such as this is
liable to generate :-), you can imagine how bad it feels when someone starts
criticising you and/or your ideas impolitely in public. Lets try and keep
the party a happy one. Public name calling escalates all too quickly to
major flame wars and too often ends up with someone leaving the list :-(.



        Russell

> Nonsense again, John.
> The same Vin, Vout, duty cycle, inductance, but different output
> currents?
> This kinda perpetual motion machine crap should be moved to [OT:]
> in my opinion.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu