On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:14:30 -0700 Andrew Warren writes: > So forget about capture/compare modules, etc., and just count > pulses on each of the 12 inputs for half a second. > > Would be much easier than all that other silliness... And if you > count pulses for 0.46875 seconds instead of 0.5 seconds, you can > convert your count of pulses directly to RPM by just > left-shifting it 3 positions. Wouldn't that be left-shifting by 7 positions? 60/0.46875 =128 = 2^7 amg ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu