> > 16f627  : 0x07A0
> > 16f627a : 0x1040
>
> I do support those chips but have never had either in my hand to test
> with.  The spec I have for the 16F627 does say it should be
> 07A0h too, so
> I guess that one is OK.

DS30034D states the correct value, DS30034A which I used originally is
wrong. What is happening, does Mirochip actually corrects its documents?
BTW the 16F628 ID was also wrong in DS30034A, corrected in -D.

>  However, according to the spec, the 16F627A
> should have an ID of 10A0h, not 1040h.  I assume you've
> verified this with
> real chips?

Hmmm I already typed YES but now I can't find a 16F627A anywhere to
verify, so maybe I did not. I'll ask one from the sample services, but
the uChip website seems to have trouble at the moment.

NB are the uChip step-down converters (TC125 etc) real stuff? My agent
does not carry them, and www.findchips.com finds no sources.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu