Hi Dave,

Thank you very much.

Point well taken, but no problem here since I've used both an Advanced
Transdata debugger and a Microchip ICE-2000 in the past. One of the big
advantages of an in-circuit debugger is that it uses your *actual* PICmicro
hardware instead of a bondout chip -- priceless! (When silicon is revved due
to errata fixes, you just buy a new PICmicro instead of a new ICE family
module.)

Thanks for your help.

Best regards,

Ken Pergola





-----Original Message-----
From: pic microcontroller discussion list
[mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of Dave Dilatush
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 3:18 PM
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [PIC]: PIC18FXX2 data sheet question regarding ICD
resources


Ken Pergola wrote...

> Question #1: What are the program memory addresses of the 512 bytes that
>the ICD2 "owns"?
> Question #2: What are the data memory addresses of the 10 bytes that the
>ICD2 "owns"?
>
>I've been looking through the data sheet and I can't find the answers to
>these questions.

This info is in the ICD2 Help section in MPLAB, in both version
6.x and 5.7x.  I don't recall seeing it in the manual.

>I'm thinking about getting a Microchip ICD2. For those that have one, are
>you happy with it?

Yes, I'm very satisfied with it- it's cheap and easy to use.  I
suppose if you're used to using a full-featured in-circuit
emulator like ICE2000 or ICE4000 you'd probably find the ICD to
be rather dinky; but it beats having no debugging tool at all.

Dave D.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu