> I also found one more problem with mplab 6.22.
> Using same code with mplab 6.22 will generate different
> timing on timer0 then mplab 6.30 does.

We've probably all had our moments with MPLAB, but that's
an interesting one. Are you talking about Stopwatch ?

BTW, I found my own little gotcha with 6.0.20 the other day.
"skpnz" macro had been mis-typed as "sknz" but there was
no compilation (ie red fail) MPASM error.  "Found label after
column 1. (SKNZ)" is in the .err file though. As this is code
being moved from the F628 to F452 I'm on the lookout for
errors, and will now pay more attention to MPASM's assembly
report, even if the assembly appears to have been successful

andlw   0x01     ->     andlw 0x1
skpnz                 ->     btfsc 0xfd8, 0x2, 0
bra     sxno        ->     bra  0x79e

andlw  0x01      ->      andlw 0x1
sknz                   ->      not compiled
bra  sxno           ->      bra 0x79c

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads