So what is Microchip's responsibility to its customers and developers who are already using erroneous silicon in their products? Sounds to me like they get away scot-free.... Cheers, Ishaan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olin Lathrop" To: Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 10:27 Subject: Re: [PIC]: You gotta be kidding me (PIC18FXX20 Rev A3) > > Phu ! > > You scared me for a minute. > > I thought this was about the 18F1220/1320 > > that I'm currently designing with. > > > > But it's about the "PIC18F8720/8620/6720/6620" > > according to the errata sheet. > > Oh, I didn't notice that either. I just saw 18Fxx20 and assumed it > included the 18F1320. > > > So I'm safe... > > No, you're not. I discovered a bug that matches this description on an > 18F1320 and it was confirmed by Microchip. So far I have assumed these > goto 20MHz, but that was only my testing a few parts on my code at room > temperature. Until a difinitive errata is released for the 18F1320, I > would assume they have the same problem. I'm staying away from > 18F1320/1220 above 4MHz until this issue is properly clarified by > Microchip. > > > ***************************************************************** > Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts > (978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com > > -- > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body