> I hear that a lot, but I am always skeptical.  Since you can use C and
> mix in assembler for time-critical parts, I don't know why anyone would
> mess with complete assembler.  The code is much more readable and
> manageable.

If you structure your code properly and COMMENT it, assembler can
be perfectly readable and manageable. You can use macros, includes,
definitions, subroutines, and labels galore to help

Try "messing" with a Scenix to manage individual 20ns cycle times in
time-critical (very) applications without using assembler throughout

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads