Olin Lathrop wrote:
> I disagree.  The 16F84 is an obsolete part.  At the very
> least, use the 16F628 which does more, costs less, and
> has the same footprint.
>
> However, unless he is designing for high volume, there is
> little point using anything other than 18F parts.

Could you ask MChip guys about big volume prices of 16F628
and 18F1220, please.

Mike, asking just out of curiosity.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics