I was actually doing that at first with my Sprint cellphone, but quickly=20 learned that it has significant jitter -- as much 5 minutes. I don't dou= bt=20 over a looonnng term that it'll be more accurate, but it seems that=20 time-updating is low-priority. I would've thought that it would keep it'= s=20 own time internally and sync with the network, but it apparently doesn't. My t-mobile phone does not grab time from the network. T-mobile is still= =20 very, very low tech, and can't even send vmail notifications to the phone= =2E...=20 they send a text-message when a vmail comes in. Cheers, -Neil. On Wednesday 11 June 2003 13:17, Steve Ruse scribbled: > If you are in the US (and probably a lot of other places), you can use = a > cell phone to get accurate time since they are constantly corrected whe= n > recieving a signal. I have tested a few against each other, & most seem= to > be set by the US atomic standard time (I don't remember the "official" > name). I checked two cell phones from different providers (Sprint & > Cingular, I believe) as well as an atomic "radio" clock, & all were wit= hin > 1/2 second of each other. > > Steve > > Quoting Picdude : > > Got my PIC clock working now, using the 32.768khz crystal and it > > "appears" to > > > > hold time much more accurately than with the Mhz-range crystals, but = how > > do I > > > > know for sure? .... all of the 10 clocks I have here are all differen= t by > > as > > > > much as 7 minutes, so I don't know which to trust. > > > > Is there a place I can connect to or call for accurate time? > > > > Cheers, > > -Neil. > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: > > [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads