At 09:47 PM 6/3/2003 -0400, Bill Couture wrote:

> >If PIC Basic is too slow to generate the frequency you want, why don't
>see if HT-Soft's free PICC compiler is fast enough?
>
>Yah, it only supports the 16F627, but that should be enough for a simple
>project like this.

Actually, an undocumented feature is that it also supports the
16F628.  Just a minor change to one of the files and voila!

John

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.