David VanHorn wrote:

>At 06:29 PM 5/28/2003 +0200, Stef wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Another word on the subject.
>>>http://www.rcbatteryclinic.com/burp.html
>>>
>>>
>>Yes, a text for a popular womans magazine or for share holders.
>>Not one number or statement that can verified ;-)
>>But what else can you expect from a battery producer ?
>>
>>But even with no figures, it's nonsense, let me just state one
>>(verifyble ;-) issue,
>>
>>  The fastest "non-reflex" charger takes about 2 hours for a full charge,
>>  whereas the reflex charger can do it in 15 minutes !!
>>  This can be a real advantage.
>>
>>So either General Electric uses other math then most of us do,
>>or General Electric is a big liar.
>>
>>
>
>Interesting. I've done a number of chargers at 90, 60, and 30 minutes.
>Must have been in a parallel universe then.
>
>Have you run capacity tests on your "charged" cells, to see what capacity they are being charged to?
>
Well  it's a more then 10 years ago, but capacities (even of broken
cells) was always well over 100% :-)
Stef

>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
>(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics