> >         Wow, those numbers are pretty much identical to what
> > I get with my David
> > tait serial bit banged programmer. The I'd say add about 5 to
> > 10 seconds and
> > that's the speed I get. On thing though, are you verifying
> > afterwards or
> > during writing? IC-Prog can verify either during or after write. TTYL
>
> For the PICs that support write with immesiate read this is done, and
> for all PICs there is a total read after writing a region (= code, data,
> fuses).
>
> Could you do the real measurements, and mention the chips you used? For
> various reasons I don't believe the times will be the same relative to
> Wisp628/xwisp for all chips.

        I don't have the resources to do that, sorry.

> NB bit-banged programmers will probably faster on a non-NT windows. The
> speed of the PC will probably not matter much.

        Not if written correctly, hardware access on NT windows can be just as fast
as non NT, if done properly. Otherwise no games would run at a reasonable
speed on Win2k/XP. TTYL

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu