On Sunday 27 April 2003 08:32, Neil Bradley wrote: > I know from experience that regardless of what the data sheets say, oft= en > implementation is different than spec. More reputable manufacturers you > usually can trust (TI/National), but assume that everything is going to > give you problems. Don't run your designs so close to spec. I've used > many 7812s from many manufacturers (TI, National, many no name brandes)= , > some claim 3 volts as an absolute minimum, some 2 volts as you mentione= d > in a prior email, and even the low voltage dropout National voltage > regulators. > > Sorry, but I'm not going to spend the time running back through data > sheets to find the specific one that says it needs 3 volts minimum to w= ork > since it's a waste of time. Just because the data sheet says that it ne= eds > a minimum voltage to work doesn't mean that it's correct under all > circumstances/loads, especially if it's a "low cost" 7812. > > If you have the ability to adjust the voltage upward, you should do so. > And remember, the regulator will act differently under different curren= t > loads. But I can tell you from experience, if you're running it that n= ear > the minimum acceptable voltage rails, you're asking for trouble. If you > turn it up to 16 volts, you may be burning off a bit more energy as hea= t, > but you are saving yourself potential headaches. > > -->Neil Well, buffers and extra overhead is fine, but every volt I add to the inp= ut,=20 while running at close to a full amp, adds an additional W of heat to be=20 dissipated, so I'm trying to optimize this as much as possible. And with= the=20 10% tolerance of the device using it, I think I've got a good buffer alre= ady. Cheers, -Neil. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads